Cellular records

Cell phone records & historical cell site analysis

Call detail records and cell site data are among the most common, and most frequently overstated, forms of digital evidence in criminal and civil cases. We analyze what the records actually show, map them correctly, and explain the limits in terms a jury can follow.

What we analyze

  • Call detail records (CDRs) from all major carriers
  • Historical cell site and sector data
  • Timing advance
  • Data session records (e.g., Verizon TDR, AT&T, T-Mobile)
  • SMS and MMS records
  • Tower dump and area dump returns
  • Carrier cell site lists and sector azimuths
  • Pen register and precision location returns

A tower is not a location

Historical cell site records identify the tower and sector that handled a phone's activity. That places the phone somewhere within that sector's coverage area, which can extend for miles, overlap with neighboring sectors, and shift with terrain, buildings, network load, and the technology in use. A wedge on a map shows directionality, not a pinpoint.

Timing advance records can narrow the estimate considerably, but each carrier records and reports these values differently, and each has its own error ranges. With so many factors at play, correct interpretation matters: it's often the difference between an opinion that survives cross-examination and one that doesn't.

Common problems we find: sector wedges drawn with arbitrary ranges, time zones mishandled between carrier formats (UTC vs. local), "first" and "last" cell confused with the serving cell for the whole session, and conclusions that a phone was "at" an address when the records only support "in the area."

Questions this analysis can answer

  • Is the phone's activity consistent, or inconsistent, with being in the area of a particular location at a particular time?
  • Does the movement pattern across towers support or contradict a witness's account or an alibi?
  • Were two phones in communication, or in the same general area, during the relevant window?
  • Was the device actively using voice, text, or data at a specific moment?
  • Does the opposing expert's map accurately represent the carrier data, and is the methodology sound?

What you receive

Depending on the engagement: a written review memo, a formal expert report with methodology and opinions stated clearly, accurate maps and demonstratives suitable for court, a rebuttal of opposing analysis, and testimony at hearings, depositions, and trial.

Background in this work

Andrew McDermott has testified as an expert on cellular call detail records in Adams, Denver, and Arapahoe Counties, Colorado, and on cellular data sessions and connectivity in Multnomah County, Oregon. He has taught CDR analysis, timing advance interpretation, and tower dump analysis to investigators and prosecutors nationwide, and completed specialized training in cellular network forensics and cell site expert testimony.

FAQ

Cell site analysis questions

How accurate is historical cell site location?

It depends on the network, the technology, the area, and the record type. In dense urban areas a sector may cover a few blocks; in rural areas, several miles. Cell site data alone generally supports statements like "consistent with being in this area," not "at this address." Timing advance records can improve precision when they're available and correctly interpreted.

Does a phone always connect to the closest tower?

No. Phones connect based on signal quality and network conditions, not straight-line distance. Terrain, buildings, tower load, antenna tilt, and the technology in use (LTE, 5G) all affect which tower and sector serves the phone. Assuming "closest tower" is a common error in cell site testimony.

Can you review the cell site analysis done by law enforcement or the FBI CAST team?

Yes. Independent review of government and opposing-expert cell site reports is a core part of the practice. We check the carrier data against the maps and conclusions, verify time zone handling and sector orientation, and identify statements that go beyond what the records support.

What records do you need?

Ideally the raw carrier returns in native format (usually spreadsheets or CSV files), the carrier's cell site list for the relevant period, any records key or legend the carrier provided, and any reports, maps, or affidavits prepared from the data.

Have a case turning on digital evidence?

Tell us about the matter. We'll run a conflict check and get back to you to discuss next steps.