Digital media evidence

Video & image evidence analysis

Video and photos are persuasive, but only if they are what they appear to be. We examine where media came from, whether it's original or altered, when it was really recorded, and how it fits with the rest of the evidence.

Sources we work with

  • Mobile device extractions
  • Social media accounts and platform legal returns
  • Cloud and messaging services
  • CCTV, DVR, and NVR surveillance systems
  • Body-worn and in-car camera systems
  • Doorbell and home security cameras
  • Dash cameras
  • Media produced in discovery

What the analysis covers

Metadata & provenance

Examination of EXIF and container metadata, embedded and system timestamps, geotags, device and codec signatures, and file structure to establish where a file came from, what device likely created it, and how it's been handled since.

Authentication & validation

Is this the original, a derivative, a re-encoded copy, or an altered file? We look for re-compression, cropping, trimming, frame-rate and aspect-ratio changes, and alterations introduced by social media platforms, and validate produced media against the source device or system of record.

Timestamp verification & synchronization

Surveillance clocks drift, time zones and daylight saving are set wrong, and every camera keeps its own time. We reconcile clock settings and drift across multiple cameras and devices to build a single, defensible timeline.

Comparative analysis

Structured comparison of images and video across sources for consistency of persons, vehicles, clothing, objects, locations, and event sequence, including tracing duplicates and re-shared copies across social media accounts and devices.

Event reconstruction & demonstratives

Frame-by-frame review, sequencing of multi-camera coverage, and correlation with phone records, extraction artifacts, location data, and telematics. Courtroom exhibits include annotated stills, side-by-side comparisons, and synchronized multi-camera timelines.

Peer review and rebuttal: we also review law enforcement and opposing-expert media analysis for methodology, documentation, and limitations, and identify conclusions that go beyond what the media can reliably establish.

Background in this work

As a task force detective, Andrew McDermott collected and preserved image and video evidence from all of these sources in forensically sound condition, with native-format retention, hash verification, and documented chain of custody. He has been endorsed as an expert in Jefferson County, Colorado (1st Judicial District) on the examination, analysis, and comparison of digital images.

FAQ

Video and image evidence questions

Can you tell whether a video has been edited?

Often, yes. File structure, encoding signatures, metadata, and frame-level characteristics can show whether a file is an original recording, a re-encoded copy, or has been trimmed or altered. The analysis also identifies what can't be determined from the available file, which matters just as much in court.

Why doesn't the time on the surveillance video match the other evidence?

Surveillance and doorbell camera clocks are frequently wrong: set to the wrong time zone, not adjusted for daylight saving, or drifting by minutes over time. We measure and correct those offsets so the video can be accurately aligned with phone records and other evidence.

Does posting to social media change a photo or video?

Usually. Most platforms re-compress media and strip or rewrite metadata. That's why the version obtained from a platform legal return or the original device can differ significantly from a downloaded copy, and why the source matters.

Have a case turning on digital evidence?

Tell us about the matter. We'll run a conflict check and get back to you to discuss next steps.